In chapters 2 and 3 we learned to quantify energy transfers — but we can only do so when we know the values of u or h, which are quantities that are impossible to measure directly in practice.
This chapter 4 (the ideal gas) aims to answer two questions:
• How can we describe the behavior of air when it is heated or compressed?
• How can we predict the values of u and h when using air?
This chapter is incompatible with chapter 5 (liquids and vapors), where we will have to forget everything learned here.
The ideal gas model defines by itself a temperature scale. It is proposed to measure the absolute temperature T very simply with a manometer, stating that it is directly proportional to the pressure p and inversely proportional to the density ρ.
We can thus say that the ideal gas does not describe the reality of things, that it is not a physical principle, but only a simplified model of gas behavior. Its range of validity is limited and fuzzy.
We will call ideal gas a fluid in the gaseous state whose product of pressure and volume, pv, remains proportional to its temperature. The proportionality constant is called the gas constant, denoted as R; it depends on the nature of the gas.
by definition for an ideal gas, where p is the pressure (Pa), v is the specific volume (m3kg−1), T is the temperature (K), and R is the gas constant of the considered gas (JK−1kg−1).
Equation 4/1 is called the equation of state of ideal gases. It can also be expressed in terms of mass:
where V is the volume (m3), and m is the mass of the gas considered (kg).
It is also possible to express Equation 4/2 in terms of the amount of substance in moles.[1] Because it is inseparable from the concept of absolute temperature, it took 150 years for this equation to take its final form: the one given by Émile Clapeyron in 1834 [5].
The ideal gas is the simplest model one can imagine to represent the behavior of a gas.
According to this model, molecules behave like spheres bouncing off each other (figure 4.1). One can imagine a large number of very small billiard balls in chaotic motion, colliding and bouncing off each other without attracting one another or dissipating their energy through friction.
Figure 4.1:An ideal gas can be visualized as a set of balls in random motion. They collide without friction and without mutual attraction. The speed of each ball changes with each collision.
Diagram CC-by-sa by Commons User:Sharayanan & Olivier Cleynen
In this chaos, temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of the molecules. It is quantified by measuring the time-averaged force resulting from the impact of the molecules on a wall of the container – that is, with pressure. With this model, we can propose a temperature scale such that T∝p.
The fewer molecules impacting the surface, and the more forcefully they must impact it in order to generate a given pressure. Thus, when the density ρ decreases at a given pressure, it means that the temperature is increasing: we can also propose T∝ρ1.
If these two proposals are combined into a single equation, we obtain a simple model to quantify temperature: T∝pv.
The behavior of molecules when they are close to each other is actually very complex, since the attractive forces then play a decisive role. The influence of these forces is all the more significant when the molecules are slow and structurally complex (the interaction between two hydrocarbon molecules, for example, is more difficult to model than the interaction between two helium molecules).
The macroscopic consequences of these interactions, and the conditions under which they should no longer be neglected, are addressed in chapter 5 (liquids and vapors).
For now, we will remember that the ideal gas model works better:
• When molecules collide at high speed, that is, when the gas temperature is high;
• When the average space between molecules is large, that is, when the specific volume of the gas is large.
These conditions ensure that the attractive forces between molecules can only play a minor role in the overall behavior of the gas. They are met for air in the vast majority of engineering applications. We will use the value
It will not take long for the student to find the limits of Equation 4/2, which indicates that a non-zero mass of ideal gas occupies zero volume at zero temperature. Strictly speaking, the ideal gas cannot exist – the mathematical model loses its meaning at very low temperatures since it does not take into account the volume of the molecules themselves.
Several other equations of state can be used to better match real gases over a wider range of properties.
Thus, the Van der Waals equation, proposed as early as the late 18th century, suggests:
This equation has the advantage of taking into account two factors ignored in the equation of state 4/1: the attractive force between molecules (the term a/v2, which becomes part of the pressure expression) and the volume occupied by the molecules themselves (the term b which is subtracted from the available volume).
Despite the difficulties inherent in quantifying the terms a and b, these modifications have significantly extended the range of application of equations of state. They earned their author, Johannes Diderik Van der Waals, the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1910.
Building mathematical models to describe the state of real gases is an important research area in fluid mechanics. The curious student can refer to equations of state such as the Beattie-Bridgeman, Benedict-Webb-Rubin, or the Strobridge models, in order get an overview of their increasing complexity. As for us, we will stick to equation 4/1.
We have already discussed the concept of thermal capacity in the first chapter (1/16). It is defined as the amount of heat required to increase the temperature of one kilogram of the substance by one Kelvin (or one degree Celsius, since these temperature differences are equal). Thus, we have:
where c is the specific thermal capacity (JK−1kg−1), δq the (specific) infinitesimal heat transfer (Jkg−1), and dT the produced infinitesimal change in temperature (K).
Since the temperature of a gas also varies when work is done on it or by it, there are an infinite number of different ways to change its temperature by one degree, by combining heat and work (figure 4.2). Each of these requires a unique amount of heat; thus, there are infinitely many thermal capacities associated with it.
Figure 4.2:Two identical quantities of gas receive the same amount of heat Q. The temperature increase will be lower on the right due to the work done on the piston.
Diagram CC-0
Among these, two particular values (figure 4.3) serve as references for describing the behavior of an ideal gas:
the thermal capacity at constant volume:cv,
the thermal capacity at constant pressure:cp.
These two quantities are properties (or state quantities, see Appendix A4 p. 316), and we will soon use them to quantify energy in gases. In an ideal gas, cv and cp are independent of temperature. In real gases, these capacities vary with temperature (figure 4.4), but for most hand-written engineering applications, it is reasonable to use average values. For air, we will take cv(air)=718Jkg−1K−1 and cp(air)=1005Jkg−1K−1.
Figure 4.3:Definitions of heat capacities. On the left, the volume is fixed and the specific thermal capacity will be cv. On the right, the pressure is constant and the capacity will be cp.
Diagram CC-0
Figure 4.4:Specific thermal capacity of air as a function of temperature. There is a noticeable change in values in the temperature range used in engineering, which we will neglect in the scope of this book.
Data from NBS Circular 564 “Tables of Thermal Properties of Gases” (1955) up to1000K, calculated
according to the model of B. G. Kyle in “Chemical and Process Thermodynamics” (1984) above1000K, and published by Israel Urieli
The large number of equations we are discussing makes this short section 4.2.2 useful, but not essential. For the engineer, its only interest is to simplify the writing of the equations in the section that comes after it.
Let us observe the amounts of energy involved in the experiment described in figure 4.3. We supply each body with a different amount of heat to achieve the same temperature change. The difference between the two required amounts of heat comes from the fact that the gas at constant pressure (on the right) has done work during the process.
What is the difference between the thermal capacities of each? In both cases, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δu (2/2). For body A on the left, since no work is done and the process is at constant volume, we can write:
This simply states that the difference between the two amounts of heat supplied to the gas is found in the work done by the gas on the right. (To be truly rigorous, in order to assert that ΔuA and ΔuB are equal, we would need to wait for equation 4/11 which comes in the next section.)
The first research undertakings aimed at exploring the concept of temperature took place at the very beginning of the 19th century. The scientific community was then very interested in gases – it was noticed that there are two ways to increase their temperature: by heating them, but also by compressing them.
Frenchman Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac sought to understand why the temperature of a gas drops when it expands (he actually sought, according to the concepts of the time, to identify the source of the caloric and the reasons why it flows). He thus endeavored to produce gas expansions that were as simple as possible, and to measure the temperature. Thirty years later, the Englishman James Prescott Joule resumed and deepened these experiments, but this time, by quantifying heat as work equivalence. These experiments with gas balloons and thermometers are anything but spectacular – but they would play a pivotal role in thermodynamics, because they allowed for the first time to distinguish heat, work, energy, and temperature. Joule’s meticulous work lead to the first formal expression of the first law of thermodynamics, and to the end of the caloric theory according to which heat was a very low-density and invisible fluid. Our modern unit for energy is named after him as a tribute to these results.
In their most remarkable experiment, Joule and Gay-Lussac were seeking to vary the pressure and volume of a gas without transferring heat or work to it. For this, they let a compressed gas in a container expand into a second, empty container (figure 4.5). The work done was zero, since no surface had been moved – the process was entirely irreversible. The temperature was measured and... nothing happened! Joule and Gay-Lussac measured neither heat transfer nor temperature variation.
Figure 4.5:The expansion of Joule and Gay-Lussac. A gas is initially trapped in a reservoir on the left; it is allowed to expand by opening the valve (in the center) which separates it from a completely empty reservoir on the right. Joule and Gay-Lussac are interested in the temperature changes measured in each reservoir. The closer the gas properties resemble the behavior of ideal gases model (§4.1.4), the smaller the temperature changes they measure, becoming undetectable for some simple gases at high temperatures.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
Joule carried out a multitude of different experiments during which he observed that regardless of the supplied work, the relationship between internal energy (which varies only with work and heat) and temperature remained essentially the same – and he suggested that for an ideal gas, it always remains identical.
This postulate is known as Joule’s law and is posited as true for any ideal gas. It can be summarized as follows:
The temperature of an ideal gas only varies with its internal energy.
The function f can be evaluated with an experiment in which the change of u is quantified. For example, during a process at constant volume q=Δu and q=cvΔT. We can thus assert that the function f is a simple proportional relation. With the internal energy arbitrarily set to zero at zero temperature (u=0Jkg−1 when T=0K), we obtain:
As long as our fluid behaves as an ideal gas, this relation 4/11 remains true. It works for any process, reversible or not, and regardless of volume, pressure, or temperature constraints.
On the other hand, it should be noted that this equation 4/11, which results from Joule’s law, does not work all for liquids and vapors. For example, we can add energy to a mass of boiling water without its temperature increasing. We will study liquids and vapors in chapter 5.
Because we have just linked the internal energy u to the temperature, and because and the product pv also depends on the temperature, we can now easily express the enthalpy h of an ideal gas in terms of temperature only.
Indeed, we have h≡u+pv (3/12); with a quick insertion of equations 4/1 and 4/11 we can write, for any ideal gas:
For any ideal gas, regardless of the process (reversible or not), where h is the specific enthalpy (Jkg−1); T is the temperature (K); and cp is the specific thermal capacity at constant pressure (Jkg−1K−1).
The ideal gas is a model for quantifying the temperature of a gas. According to this model, the three main forms of energy we have used so far — internal energy u, enthalpy h, and the term pv — are directly proportional to the temperature T:
Here we intend to calculate the properties of an ideal gas, as well as the energy transfers involved, when it is compressed or expanded under completely arbitrary constraints of volume, pressure, or temperature.
The gas processes we study here are very hypothetical and not necessarily exciting, but they deserve the attention of the student for two reasons:
The behavior of gases is inherently complex, even when we use the ideal gas model. These elementary processes serve as small exercises for us, to help us learn step by step;
These elementary processes are conceptual tools that we will later assemble, first to quantify the theoretical limits of machines (in chapter 7), and then to describe the behavior of gases inside real machines (in chapter 10).
It is possible to heat or cool a gas while maintaining its pressure constant (figure 4.6). A process at constant pressure is called isobaric. In order to generate such a process, we can:
• with a closed system, heat or cool the gas while maintaining a constant force on the walls;
• with an open system, heat or cool the gas by simply letting it flow in a duct, without any moving parts. This is the case, for example, in the combustion chamber of a jet engine.
When the pressure is constant, the properties of the gas vary according to the relation
Figure 4.6:A constant-pressure (isobaric) process undergone by an ideal gas. In a closed system (left), the piston exerts a constant force throughout the process. In an open system (right), no work is done.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
Figure 4.7:Heating at constant pressure of an ideal gas, represented on a pressure-volume diagram.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
In a closed system, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δu (2/2) and, if the process is reversible, heat and work can be easily related to the temperature:
during a reversible process at constant pressure, in a closed system.
When the process takes place in an open system, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δh (3/15), and, if the process is reversible, heat and work can be easily quantified:
It is possible to heat or cool a gas while maintaining its volume constant (figure 4.8). A process at constant volume is called isochoric.
• With a closed system, we can heat or cool a gas in a fixed and closed reservoir. This is the case, for example, during the combustion phase in a gasoline engine.
• With an open system, the manipulation is more complex. When heating the gas, we must compress it, in order to prevent its volume from increasing; conversely, while cooling it, we must expand it so as to prevent its volume from decreasing. This manipulation has no common practical application.
When the specific volume of a perfect gas is constant, its properties vary according to the relation
during a reversible process at constant volume, in a closed system.
Figure 4.8:A constant-volume (isochoric) process undergone by an ideal gas. In a closed system (left), the volume is fixed and no work is done. In an open system (right), the gas must be compressed while heating and expanded while cooling, to maintain the specific volume constant.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
Figure 4.9:Cooling of an ideal gas at constant volume, represented on a pressure-volume diagram.
during a reversible process at constant volume, in a closed system.
When the process occurs in an open system, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δh and, if the process is reversible, heat and work can be quantified, although with a little more difficulty:
It is possible to heat or cool a gas while maintaining its temperature constant (figure 4.10). A process at constant temperature is called isothermal.
For an ideal gas, a process at constant temperature always occurs at constant energy. For each joule of heat supplied to the gas, one joule of work must be extracted from it; conversely, every heat withdrawal must be compensated by an equal amount of work input.
In practice, this complexity makes it so that isothermal heat transfers are rarely used in industry. However, they have crucial theoretical importance, which we will explore in chapter 7 (the second law).
When the temperature of an ideal gas remains constant, its properties vary according to the relation
In a closed system, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δu, and if the process is reversible, heat and work can be related to the properties of the gas, although not without some difficulty.
Figure 4.10:A constant-temperature (isothermal) process undergone by an ideal gas. In a closed system (left), the gas is allowed to do work on a piston while being heated, and conversely, work is done on the gas when it is cooled. In an open system (right), the same manipulations are carried out continuously.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
Figure 4.11:Expansion (heating) at constant temperature of an ideal gas, represented on a pressure-volume diagram.
during a reversible process at constant temperature, in an open system.
This relation, identical to equation 4/27, should not surprise the insightful student, since the pv= constant relationship ensures that for two given points in figure 4.11, the area under the curve is always equal to the area to the left of the curve.
The heat transfer can be quantified without difficulty, of course:
An adiabatic process is one where there is no heat transfer (figure 4.12). This can be achieved by wrapping the gas container or duct with a thick layer of thermal insulation.
Figure 4.12:A reversible adiabatic (isentropic) process undergone by an ideal gas. In a closed system (left) as well as in an open system (right), the apparatus is perfectly insulated, so that there is no heat transfer, even if the gas temperature varies.
A reversible adiabatic process is carried out infinitely slowly. A piston in a cylinder will need to be moved infinitely slowly for this, and a steady-flow compressor will need to be infinitely long. Later, in chapter 8 (entropy), we will call these processes isentropic.
It must be noted that even though there is absolutely no heat transfer, the temperature must necessarily vary in such a process, since the work is non-zero. This temperature change is often the intended effect, as we will see in chapter 7 (the second law).
In a closed system, we have q1→2+w1→2=Δu and, if the process is reversible, heat and work are quantified without any difficulty:
during a reversible adiabatic process, in an open system.
Figure 4.13:Reversible adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas, represented on a pressure-volume diagram.
Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
Unfortunately, these two equations 4/32 and 4/34 are of no use until we have predicted the temperature T2 at the end of the process. However, in a reversible adiabatic process, nothing remains constant: the specific volume, pressure, and temperature all vary. How can we quantify these properties?
Let us start with an infinitely small adiabatic process in a closed system.
Thus, we have linked temperature and specific volume when the process is reversible adiabatic (devoid of heat transfer and infinitely slow).
Some algebraic manipulations, which are left to the student to revise, allow us to derive this expression in terms of pressure. We thus obtain the following three relations:
It is important to keep in mind that in practice, the properties of a gas can be changed in any arbitrary manner (figure 4.14).
Figure 4.14:An entirely arbitrary process undergone by an ideal gas represented on a pressure-volume diagram. Such a process requires a complex combination of heat and work transfers, which the student is invited to conceptualize.
CC-0 Olivier Cleynen
We have focused on four specific processes of ideal gases, since each plays an important role for physicists and engineers in the design of thermal machines. However, this should not limit our way of thinking about a gas or the changes it may undergo. By cleverly controlling heat and work transfers, we can certainly cause any arbitrary process.
We assume that for a reversible adiabatic process (without heat transfer and infinitely slow), the properties of air are linked according to the following three relationships:
We also assume that during a reversible isothermal process (at constant temperature and infinitely slow) of an ideal gas, the work done in an open or closed system is:
Figure 4.15:A small electric compressor mounted on a portable air tank
Figure 4.16:Elementary processes undergone by a perfect gas
Figure 4.17:Air intake of one of the four General Electric GEnx-2B turbofans equipping a Boeing 747-8. The two-color fan blades are visible in the foreground; behind, the air flow is divided between the compressor inlet (internal) and the cold flow rectifier stators (external).
Figure 4.18:Diesel Engine from 1898, manufactured under license by Sulzer in Switzerland
Figure 4.19:Schematic of a turbojet engine. Air flows through the machine from left to right.
Figure 4.20:Compressor of a dissected snecma Atar turbojet engine (1948). Air flows from the left to the center of the image.
Sometimes in other books, the constant in JK−1kg−1 is denoted as r. The quantity then denoted R=8.3143JK−1mol−1 is universal, and gases adopt different values of r depending on their molar mass M≡nm. In this book, we do not quantify amounts of substance.