Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Chapter opening illustration

3. Open Systems

Open Systems

Measuring the Intangible in the Ungraspable

Illustration from the original text

Introduction

In the previous chapter, we quantified energy exchanges within closed systems. This chapter 3 (open systems) aims to answer a similar question: how to quantify energy transfers within a system when it is crossed by a mass flow?

3.1 Why Use an Open System?

In many machines, the fluid used to transfer heat and work is continuously circulating. It can then be difficult to identify a particular amount of mass, making it a closed system, in order to quantify energy transfers to and from it. For example, in a jet engine nozzle, air expands and accelerates continuously: at any given moment, there is no identifiable volume that would have one specific speed or one particular pressure.

Using an open system is very useful to account for energy in flows. Rather than separating stages in time (for example before and after compression), we quantify work and heat transfers by separating stages in space (for example upstream and downstream of the compressor).

3.2 Accounting Conventions

3.2.1 The open system

We call an open system an arbitrary subject of study whose boundaries are permeable to mass (figure 3.3). In general, its volume can change, and it can have multiple inlets and outlets, each with a different flow rate and pressure.

Sign conventions for an open system. Inflows are positive, outflows are negative; they are all represented with inward arrows.

Figure 3.1:Sign conventions for an open system. Inflows are positive, outflows are negative; they are all represented with inward arrows.

In our study of thermodynamics, we will only use open systems:

• with fixed volume;

• having only one inlet and one outlet;

• being crossed by a constant mass flow ratem˙\dot{m} (positive by convention).

These systems are said to be in steady state (sometimes called steady flow or stationary flow regime).

3.2.2 Sign conventions

Just like for closed systems, we will take the open system’s point of view to quantify transfers:

• Receiving work, heat, or mass results in a positive transfer;

• Expending work, heat, or mass results in a negative transfer.

Thus, we add up all transfers as on a bank statement.

3.3 The First Law in an Open System

We have seen that in a closed system, the law of conservation of energy is expressed by the equation q+w=Δuq+w = \Delta u (2/2). In an open system, the situation is a little different and we must consider additional forms of energy.

3.3.1 Entering and exiting the system: flow work

Let’s imagine an open system in steady flow, containing a small water pump. In order to insert water into the pump at a given pressure, energy must be supplied to the system. Conversely, to push the water outside (at a higher pressure), the system must supply energy. How can we quantify this energy?

Consider the case of a fluid element (namely, a small quantity of fluid in transit, with volume Velement)V_{\mathrm{element}}) entering our system at pressure p1p_{1} (figure 3.2).

The work WinsertionW_{\mathrm{insertion}} received by the system when the element is pushed through the insertion is:

Winsertion=p1VelementW_{\mathrm{insertion}}= p_{1}V_{\mathrm{element}}

where WinsertionW_{\mathrm{insertion}} is the insertion work (J)(J), and VelementV_{\mathrm{element}} is the volume of the fluid element (m3)(m^{3}).

If such a volume of fluid enters the system every second, then the system receives power in the form of work, which we call insertion power,W˙insertion\dot{W}_{\mathrm{insertion}}.

A fluid element of volume entering at pressure into the open system.

Figure 3.2:A fluid element of volume VelementV_{\mathrm{element}} entering at pressure pp into the open system.

Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen

We sometimes express it in specific form (§1.1.5):

Winsertion=p1V˙1=m˙1p1v1=m˙p1v1W_{\mathrm{insertion}}= p_{1}\dot{V}_{1}=\dot{m}_{1}p_{1}v_{1}=\dot{m} p_{1}v_{1}
winsertion=p1v1w_{\mathrm{insertion}}= p_{1}v_{1}

where W˙insertion\dot{W}_{\mathrm{insertion}} is the insertion power (W)(W), winsertionw_{\mathrm{insertion}} is the specific insertion power (Jkg1)(J kg^{-1}), m˙1\dot{m}_{1} is the net mass flow rate at 1 (kgs1)(kg s^{-1}), m˙\dot{m} is the mass flow rate crossing the system (always positive, kgs1)kg s^{-1}), V1V_{1} is the volumetric flow rate of fluid (m3s1)(m^{3}s^{-1}), and v1v_{1} is the specific volume of the fluid at the inlet (m3kg1)(m^{3}kg^{-1}).

Similarly, for the fluid to exit the system at the other end, the system must continuously supply a power called extraction power:

Wextraction=p2V˙2=m˙2p2v2=m˙p2v2W_{\mathrm{extraction}}= -p_{2}\dot{V}_{2}=\dot{m}_{2}p_{2}v_{2}= -\dot{m} p_{2}v_{2}
wextraction=p2v2w_{\mathrm{extraction}}= -p_{2}v_{2}

where the outgoing mass flow ratem˙2\dot{m}_{2} (negative) is expressed in terms of the mass flow ratem˙\dot{m} crossing the system (always positive, kgs1)kg s^{-1}).

The net sum of these two powers at the boundaries is called flow power, WflowW˙insertion+W˙extractionW_{\mathrm{flow}}\equiv \dot{W}_{\mathrm{insertion}}+\dot{W}_{\mathrm{extraction}}. Its sign depends on the operating conditions – the student is encouraged to visualize and formulate the conditions under which the flow power can be negative, zero, or positive.

3.3.2 Energy balance

Let us try to design an open system in steady flow in the most general way possible, as represented in figure 3.3. We will now account for all energy transfers within it.

When entering the system, the fluid already has an internal energy u1u_{1}; therefore, the system sees its own internal energy increase with powerU˙1\dot{U}_{1}:

U˙1=m˙u1\dot{U}_{1}=\dot{m} u_{1}

Similarly, the fluid has a specific mechanical energy emech1e_{\mathrm{mech}1} (equation 1/9), and the system also receives power E˙mech1\dot{E}_{\mathrm{mech}1}:

E˙mech1=m˙emech1=m˙(12C12+gz1)\dot{E}_{\mathrm{mech}1}=\dot{m} e_{\mathrm{mech}1}=\dot{m} \bigl(\tfrac{1}{2} C_{1}^{2}+ g z_{1}\bigr)

These expressions 3/6 and 3/7 have the opposite sign at the system’s outlet, where we assign them the index 2.

At this point, we have covered all of the energy forms that can be observed crossing the boundaries of an open system together with the fluid: flow work, internal energy, and mechanical energy. Since the first law states that energy is indestructible (§1.1.2), the addition of power Q˙\dot{Q} in the form of heat or W˙\dot{W} in the form of work can only vary these three forms. This results in the equation:

Q˙12+W˙12+(W˙insertion+U˙1+E˙mech1)+(W˙extraction+U˙2+E˙mech2)=0\dot{Q}_{1\rightarrow 2}+\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}+ (\dot{W}_{\mathrm{insertion}}+\dot{U}_{1}+\dot{E}_{\mathrm{mech}1}) + (\dot{W}_{\mathrm{extraction}}+\dot{U}_{2}+\dot{E}_{\mathrm{mech}2}) = 0

where all terms are expressed in watts.

An arbitrary open system. The system (whose boundaries are dashed lines, in red) is crossed from left to right by the fluid flowing with a constant mass flow rate $\dot{m}$. It receives power $\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}$ in the form of work and power $\dot{Q}_{1\rightarrow 2}$ in the form of heat.

Figure 3.3:An arbitrary open system. The system (whose boundaries are dashed lines, in red) is crossed from left to right by the fluid flowing with a constant mass flow rate m˙\dot{m}. It receives power W˙12\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2} in the form of work and power Q˙12\dot{Q}_{1\rightarrow 2} in the form of heat.

Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen

We can re-express equation 3/8 in terms of directly measurable quantities:

Q˙12+W˙12+m˙(p1v1+u1+12C12+gz1)=m˙(p2v2+u2+12C22+gz2)\dot{Q}_{1\rightarrow 2}+\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}+\dot{m} \bigl(p_{1}v_{1}+ u_{1}+ \tfrac{1}{2} C_{1}^{2}+ g z_{1}\bigr) =\dot{m} \bigl(p_{2}v_{2}+ u_{2}+ \tfrac{1}{2} C_{2}^{2}+ g z_{2}\bigr)

or:

Q˙12+W˙12=m˙[Δu+Δ(pv)+12Δ(C2)+gΔz]\dot{Q}_{1\rightarrow 2}+\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}=\dot{m}\bigl[\Delta u + \Delta (pv) + \tfrac{1}{2}\Delta (C^{2}) + g \Delta z\bigr]
q12+w12=Δu+Δ(pv)+Δemech.q_{1\rightarrow 2}+ w_{1\rightarrow 2}= \Delta u + \Delta (pv) + \Delta e_{\mathrm{mech}.}

where the symbols Δ\Delta indicate the change of properties between points 1 and 2 within the system.

Equations 3/9 and 3/11 are extremely useful in thermodynamics, because they allow us to quantify by deduction the powers involved in flows. They allow us, in particular, to predict the properties of the fluid at the outlet of a device for which we know the mechanical power and heat emissions. For example, we can determine the remaining energy in the air at the outlet of a turbine for which we know the power.

3.3.3 Enthalpy

In many cases, the terms uu and pvpv vary in the same manner together with the state of the fluid (in fact, we will even see in the next chapter that in the case of an ideal gas, they are both proportional to the temperature). In order to simplify their use in calculations, they are often combined into a single term.

We call the sum of the terms uu and pvpv the specific enthalpy, and assign it the symbol hh:

hu+pvh \equiv u + p v

where the terms are expressed in Jkg1J kg^{-1}.

Of course, the enthalpy HH is simply defined as:

HmhH \equiv m h

where HH is measured in joules (J).

In practice, the term enthalpy is often used even if it refers to specific enthalpy; the symbol and context help determine which variable is being referred to.

By using the concept of enthalpy, equations 3/9 and 3/11 are simplified to become:

Q12+W˙12=m˙(Δh+Δemech.)Q_{1\rightarrow 2}+\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}=\dot{m}(\Delta h + \Delta e_{\mathrm{mech}.})
q12+w12=Δh+Δemech.q_{1\rightarrow 2}+ w_{1\rightarrow 2}= \Delta h + \Delta e_{\mathrm{mech}.}

Thus, in an open system, we see that heat and work transfers change the enthalpy of the fluid, and not only its internal energy as in a closed system.

3.4 Quantifying Work with an Open System

3.4.1 Work of a fluid in a slow process

We have seen that when the fluid undergoes a slow process, the work done by a closed system can be quantified by carrying out the integral pdv-\int pdv (2/15). With an open system, the expression is slightly different. In order to develop it, we propose to study the steady compression of a fluid passing through a compressor.

To this end, let us first observe the process undergone by a fixed mass quantity mAm_{A} circulating in the compressor (figure 3.4). As it passes between the moving blades, its pressure varies by dpdp and its volume by dvdv. This is simply a moving closed system: since the process is very slow (reversible), the work δwmAw_{m_{\mathrm{A}}} received by the system will be:

δwmA=pdvδ w_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}= -pdv

during a reversible process, and where the notation δ is used to denote the infinitesimal transfer of work (work being a path quantity, see Appendix A4 p. 316).

A fixed mass quantity 𝑚𝐴flows from left to right through a compressor. It is compressed: its properties change from 𝑝and 𝑣to 𝑝+ d𝑝and 𝑣+ d𝑣. If we consider the point of view of a closed system in transit, the work transfer is δ𝑤𝑚A = −𝑝d𝑣.

Figure 3.4:A fixed mass quantity mAm_{A} flows from left to right through a compressor. It is compressed: its properties change from pp and vv to p+dpp + dp and v+dvv + dv. If we consider the point of view of a closed system in transit, the work transfer is δwmA=pdvw_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}= -pdv.

Now, let’s observe the course of this same phenomenon from the point of view of an open system (figure 3.5). What specific power δwO.S.w_{\mathrm{O.S}.} must be supplied to the compressor so that each fluid particle receives work δwmAw_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}?

The same flow as in figure 3.4, now observed from the viewpoint of a stationary open system crossed from left to right by a steady flow. We seek to quantify the work δ$w_{\mathrm{O.S}.}$ to be supplied to the system so that each mass quantity $m_{\mathrm{A}}$ receives work δ$w_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}$.

Figure 3.5:The same flow as in figure 3.4, now observed from the viewpoint of a stationary open system crossed from left to right by a steady flow. We seek to quantify the work δwO.S.w_{\mathrm{O.S}.} to be supplied to the system so that each mass quantity mAm_{\mathrm{A}} receives work δwmAw_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}.

The open system has four work transfer forms:

The specific insertion power winsertionw_{\mathrm{insertion}} (3/3) is due to the permanent arrival of the fluid at the system’s inlet. From the viewpoint of the open system, we have:

winsertion=+pvw_{\mathrm{insertion}}= +p v

The specific compression power -δwmAw_{m_{\mathrm{A}}} is the specific work that the open system must transfer to each mass quantity mAm_{A} to effectively compress it:

δwmA=(pdv)-\delta w_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}= -(-pdv)

The specific extraction power wextractionw_{\mathrm{extraction}} is spent by the open system to continuously remove the fluid. At the outlet, the fluid properties have become p+dpp + dp for pressure, and v+dvv + dv for volume. Thus, we have:

wextraction=(p+dp)(v+dv)w_{\mathrm{extraction}}= -(p + dp)(v + dv)

The specific power received from the outside δwO.S.w_{\mathrm{O.S}.} is the power that feeds the compression: this is the quantity we aim to quantify.

These four powers cancel each other out, since the total work transfer involved in the flow does not depend on the adopted viewpoint:

δwO.S.+winsertion+(δwmA)+wextraction=0\delta w_{\mathrm{O.S}.}+ w_{\mathrm{insertion}}+ (-\delta w_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}) + w_{\mathrm{extraction}}= 0

Therefore, we can quantify the specific power δwO.S.w_{\mathrm{O.S}.} that must be supplied to the compressor:

δwO.S.=winsertion+δwmAwextraction\delta w_{\mathrm{O.S}.}= -w_{\mathrm{insertion}}+ \delta w_{m_{\mathrm{A}}}- w_{\mathrm{extraction}}
δwO.S.=pv+(pdv)+(p+dp)(v+dv)=pvpdv+pv+pdv+dpv+dpdv=dpv+dpdv\begin{aligned} \delta w_{\mathrm{O.S}.}&= -p v + (-pdv) + (p + dp)(v + dv) \\ &= -p v - pdv + p v + pdv + dp v + dp dv \\ &= dp v + dp dv \end{aligned}

And since the product dp×dvdp \times dv tends to zero when using infinitesimal quantities, we obtain the surprising expression:

δwO.S.=vdp\delta w_{\mathrm{O.S}.}= vdp

The terms dpdp and dvdv in our study are not necessarily positive: this expression applies equally to expansions and compressions, as long as they are reversible.

By integrating this expression 3/21 to apply it to the general case in steady flow, we obtain:

wO.S.=vdpw_{\mathrm{O.S}.}= \int vdp
WAB=m˙vdpW_{\mathrm{A}\rightarrow \mathrm{B}}=\dot{m}\int vdp

in steady flow, when the process is reversible, and regardless of the heat input.

Thus, when we want to quantify reversible work in an open system, it is the integral +vdp+ \int vdp that needs to be calculated, and not pdv-\int pdv.

On a pressure-volume diagram, we can visualize this work by adding the insertion work and extraction work to the compression work, as shown in figure 3.6. The reversible work done in steady, reversible flow is thus visualized by the area enclosed to the left of the curve, as shown in figure 3.7.

Work received by an open system crossed by a fluid, during a slow process. The system first receives the insertion work $(p_{\mathrm{ini}.}v_{\mathrm{ini}.}$, in orange, positive) to enter the system, then it spends compression work (hatched area, negative), and finally, it spends extraction work $(p_{\mathrm{fin}.}v_{\mathrm{fin}.}$, in blue, negative). The net sum of these three areas is the specific power to be supplied to the open system.

Figure 3.6:Work received by an open system crossed by a fluid, during a slow process. The system first receives the insertion work (pini.vini.(p_{\mathrm{ini}.}v_{\mathrm{ini}.}, in orange, positive) to enter the system, then it spends compression work (hatched area, negative), and finally, it spends extraction work (pfin.vfin.(p_{\mathrm{fin}.}v_{\mathrm{fin}.}, in blue, negative). The net sum of these three areas is the specific power to be supplied to the open system.

Work measured in an open system, during a reversible process. The integral of $vdp$ is visualized by the area to the left of the curve. If the fluid returns to its initial state (having completed a *thermodynamic cycle*), the work done is visualized by the area enclosed within the curve. In this case, the quantification is the same for closed and open systems.

Figure 3.7:Work measured in an open system, during a reversible process. The integral of vdpvdp is visualized by the area to the left of the curve. If the fluid returns to its initial state (having completed a thermodynamic cycle), the work done is visualized by the area enclosed within the curve. In this case, the quantification is the same for closed and open systems.

Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen

Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen

Illustration from the original text

3.4.2 Work of a fluid in a fast process

When the process is carried out rapidly (as is always the case in practice), we encounter the phenomena described in the previous chapter (§2.4.3): the pressure exerted on the moving walls no longer corresponds to the “average” pressure inside the fluid. The work required in compressions is greater and the work received during expansions is less than during slow processes.

Using an open system to account for energy transfers does not change the problem, of course. We do not have the means to predict analytically the work required for compression at a given speed. The problem –calculating the spatial distribution of pressure inside the fluid over time– falls within the scope of fluid mechanics, and will be solved on a case-by-case basis.

Reversible (solid line) and irreversible (dashed line) compressions represented on a pressure-volume diagram. In an open system, work transfers can be visualized with the area to the left of the curve, but only when the processes are reversible.

Figure 3.8:Reversible (solid line) and irreversible (dashed line) compressions represented on a pressure-volume diagram. In an open system, work transfers can be visualized with the area to the left of the curve, but only when the processes are

Diagram CC-0 Olivier Cleynen reversible.

On our pressure-volume diagrams, we represent irreversible processes with a dashed line, to clearly differentiate them from reversible processes, as shown in figure 3.8.

Illustration from the original text
Illustration from the original text

3.5 Quantifying Heat with an Open System

With an open system, we will use the same method as with a closed system: since we cannot quantify heat transfers directly, we will always proceed by deduction. Mathematically, we simply reuse equation 3/14 to obtain:

Q12=m˙(Δh+Δemech.)W˙12Q_{1\rightarrow 2}=\dot{m}(\Delta h + \Delta e_{\mathrm{mech}.}) -\dot{W}_{1\rightarrow 2}
q12=Δh+Δemech.w12q_{1\rightarrow 2}= \Delta h + \Delta e_{\mathrm{mech}.}- w_{1\rightarrow 2}

for an open system.

Once again, the main challenge in quantifying a heat transfer is predicting and quantifying the change in enthalpy, Δh\Delta h. For gases, hh is almost proportional to temperature; for liquids and vapors, the relationship is more complex. We will learn how to quantify enthalpy in fluids in chapter 4 (the ideal gas) and chapter 5 (liquids and vapors).

Problems

Schematic diagram and photo of a steam turbine.

Figure 3.10:Schematic diagram and photo of a steam turbine.

Schematic diagram of an electricity-generating turboshaft engine

Figure 3.11:Schematic diagram of an electricity-generating turboshaft engine

Schematic diagram of a boiler operating from the combustion of waste.

Figure 3.12:Schematic diagram of a boiler operating from the combustion of waste.

Schematic diagram of a nozzle and installation (with variable geometry) on the Pratt & Whitney F100 engine of a Lockheed Martin F-16.

Figure 3.13:Schematic diagram of a nozzle and installation (with variable geometry) on the Pratt & Whitney F100 engine of a Lockheed Martin F-16.

Schematic diagram of a hydroelectric power plant

Figure 3.14:Schematic diagram of a hydroelectric power plant

Schematic diagram of the modified power plant. A rigid pipe brings water to the turbine placed lower down.

Figure 3.15:Schematic diagram of the modified power plant. A rigid pipe brings water to the turbine placed lower down.

Schematic diagram of an afterburner system. Its operation is studied in §10.6.2 p. 291.

Figure 3.16:Schematic diagram of an afterburner system. Its operation is studied in §10.6.2 p. 291.

Schematic diagram of a turboprop engine. These engines are studied in more detail in §10.5.4 p. 286.

Figure 3.17:Schematic diagram of a turboprop engine. These engines are studied in more detail in §10.5.4 p. 286.