Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

We’ve talked about the central conservation laws of classical mechanics:

We’ve worked with the conservation of energy a lot because it’s a fundamental concept in physics and it lends itself to a scalar equation analysis. This can be quite a bit simpler in many cases, but an energy only view of the world can be limiting.

Linear Momentum

As we move into the formal study of linear momentum, we will start with a reminder of the definition of momentum, and the mathematical form of the conservation of momentum.

Linear momentum is a vector quantity defined as the product of an object’s mass and its velocity. It is denoted by the symbol p⃗\vec{p} and is defined as:

p⃗=mv⃗\vec{p} = m\vec{v}

where mm is the mass of the object and v⃗\vec{v} is the velocity of the object. The SI unit of momentum is kg m/s. As we later came to understand with Einstein’s special theory of relativity, this definition of momentum is the classical limit of the relativistic momentum:

p⃗=γmv⃗\vec{p} = \gamma m\vec{v}

where γ\gamma is the Lorentz factor,

γ=11−v2c2.\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.

As you can calculate, the relativistic momentum reduces to the classical momentum when the velocity is much less than the speed of light. As v/c→0v/c \rightarrow 0, γ→1\gamma \rightarrow 1, and the relativistic momentum reduces to the classical momentum.

Linear Momentum and Newton’s Second Law

You have seen in our discussion of Newton’s Second Law that the net force on a system is equal to the mass of the system times the acceleration of the system. This can be written as:

F⃗net=ma⃗.\vec{F}_{net}=m\vec{a}.

However, this definition and our thinking here with it is a bit limited. What about systems of objects that are interacting with each other? What about deformable systems? What happens if something is shedding mass, like a rocket or jet?

Newton’s definition from the Principia is a bit more general. He defines the force in terms of the rate of change of the body’s momentum:

F⃗net=dp⃗dt.\vec{F}_{net}=\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}.

We can extend that definition to a system of objects, where the net force on the system is equal to the rate of change of the total momentum of the system:

F⃗net=dp⃗sysdt.\vec{F}_{net}=\frac{d\vec{p}_{sys}}{dt}.

The second step might not be obvious, but by working through a few examples we can see how this is a more useful and general definition of force.

Forces internal to a system zero out

Consider an abstract system of NN particles. You might think of them as point particles but they could be extended objects. They experience outside forces and internal forces; i.e., we go a tag all the particles in our system and we can tell which ones are interacting with each other. We can also tell which ones are interacting with the outside world. This is a bit silly, but it can help us visualize what we are arguing below.

The total force on the system is given by the sum of all the masses times the acceleration of each particle:

F⃗total=∑i=1Nmia⃗i=∑i=1NF⃗i\vec{F}_{total} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} m_i\vec{a}_i = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F}_i

where the last term is the net force on the ithith particle. For a given object, ii, the net force is the sum of all the forces acting on it, both internal and external,

F⃗i=F⃗iint+F⃗iext.\vec{F}_{i} = \vec{F}_{i}^{int} + \vec{F}_{i}^{ext}.

Here these internal forces are pairwise interactions between the particle ii and every other particle in the system,

F⃗iint=∑j≠iNF⃗ij,\vec{F}_{i}^{int} = \sum_{j\neq i}^{N} \vec{F}_{ij},

where the sum is over all particles that are not ii because there’s no force between a particle and itself.

Cool, what happens to the internal force equation when we sum over all particles in the system?

Concrete Examples

We have a generic setup, let’s see what happens when we apply this to a few examples: 2 particles, 3 particles, and then N particles.

Two Particles

With two particles the sum is easy to write out fully.

F⃗int=∑i=12F⃗iint\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^{2} \vec{F}_{i}^{int}
F⃗int=∑i=12∑j≠i2F⃗ij\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^2 \sum_{j\neq i}^{2} \vec{F}_{ij}
F⃗int=F⃗12+F⃗21=0\vec{F}_{int} = \vec{F}_{12} + \vec{F}_{21} = 0

By Newton’s Third Law, the force of particle 1 on particle 2 is equal and opposite to the force of particle 2 on particle 1. The internal forces cancel out and the net force on the system is the sum of the external forces.

F⃗12=−F⃗21\vec{F}_{12} = -\vec{F}_{21}

So here the internal forces sum to zero.

F⃗int=0\vec{F}_{int} = 0
Three Particles

We can write this out in a similar way.

F⃗int=∑i=13F⃗iint\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^{3} \vec{F}_{i}^{int}
F⃗int=∑i=13∑j≠i3F⃗ij\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^3 \sum_{j\neq i}^{3} \vec{F}_{ij}
F⃗int=F⃗12+F⃗13+F⃗23+F⃗21+F⃗31+F⃗32\vec{F}_{int} = \vec{F}_{12} + \vec{F}_{13} + \vec{F}_{23} + \vec{F}_{21} + \vec{F}_{31} + \vec{F}_{32}

We can group these terms by Newton’s Third Law pairs.

F⃗int=(F⃗12+F⃗21)+(F⃗13+F⃗31)+(F⃗23+F⃗32)=0\vec{F}_{int} = (\vec{F}_{12} + \vec{F}_{21}) + (\vec{F}_{13} + \vec{F}_{31}) + (\vec{F}_{23} + \vec{F}_{32}) = 0

Every interaction on body ii has a corresponding equal and opposite interaction on body jj, and the internal forces are again zero.

F⃗int=0\vec{F}_{int} = 0
N Particles

Clearly, there seems to be a pattern here. Namely that the internal forces are always zero. We can write out the sum for NN particles in a way that suggests this is always true.

F⃗int=∑i=1NF⃗iint\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F}_{i}^{int}
F⃗int=∑i=1N∑j≠iNF⃗ij\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{j\neq i}^{N} \vec{F}_{ij}

And where we make a switch in the sum terms, so we can counting the force from each interaction in each term in the sum to make it clear why the internal forces sum to zero.

F⃗int=∑i=1N∑j>iN(F⃗ij+F⃗ji⏟always 0)=0\vec{F}_{int} = \sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{j>i}^{N} \left(\underbrace{\vec{F}_{ij} + \vec{F}_{ji}}_{\mathrm{always}\,0}\right) = 0

For a closed system whose internal interactions obey Newton’s third law, internal forces appear in third-law pairs, so their vector sum is zero. This is a very powerful result.

F⃗int=0 , always\vec{F}_{int} = 0\,\mathrm{,\,always}

For a given system, only external forces can change the momentum.

Mathematical Form of Conservation of Linear Momentum

Let’s look back at the system momentum,

p⃗sys=∑i=1Nmiv⃗i=∑i=1Np⃗i.\vec{p}_{sys} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} m_i\vec{v}_i = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{p}_i.

If we take the time derivative of the system momentum, and assume we have point particles, so the masses are not changing,

dp⃗sysdt=∑i=1Nmidv⃗idt=∑i=1Nmia⃗i=∑i=1NF⃗i\dfrac{d\vec{p}_{sys}}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} m_i\dfrac{d\vec{v}_i}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} m_i\vec{a}_i = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F}_i

The net force on the system is given by,

F⃗net=F⃗int+F⃗ext.\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{int} + \vec{F}_{ext}.

Should there be no external forces, then,

F⃗net=F⃗int=0.\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{int} = 0.

And thus there is no change momentum of the system,

dp⃗sysdt=0.\dfrac{d\vec{p}_{sys}}{dt} = 0.

So if the system has no external forces, the total momentum of the system is conserved. We can propose a discrete extension to this form above where

dp⃗sysdt≈Δp⃗sysΔt=0.\dfrac{d\vec{p}_{sys}}{dt} \approx \dfrac{\Delta\vec{p}_{sys}}{\Delta t} = 0.

And thus, it’s easy to see:

Δp⃗sys=p⃗sys,f−p⃗sys,i=0.\Delta \vec{p}_{sys} = \vec{p}_{sys,f} - \vec{p}_{sys,i} = 0.

If there are external forces, then we also have a prediction equation for how the momentum will change in a small time step Δt\Delta t:

Δp⃗sys=p⃗sys,f−p⃗sys,i=∑i=1NF⃗ext,iΔt,\Delta \vec{p}_{sys} = \vec{p}_{sys,f} - \vec{p}_{sys,i} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F}_{ext,i}\Delta t,

so that,

p⃗sys,f=p⃗sys,i+F⃗extΔt.\vec{p}_{sys,f} = \vec{p}_{sys,i} + \vec{F}_{ext}\Delta t.

Let’s see this play out in a closed system: two carts collide elastically on a track with no external horizontal forces. Each cart’s own momentum changes at the collision, but the system’s total momentum (dashed) is identical before and after.

<Figure size 700x500 with 1 Axes>

Angular Momentum

Angular momentum is a complex and rich quantity that has deep connections to the shape and structure of a system. The “configuration” or how it is distributed in space can have a big impact on the dynamics of a system. Our study of classical angular momentum will be a stepping stone to our study of quantum angular momentum and the spin of particles.

For the moment, we will limit ourselves to classical angular momentum and we will focus on the abstract case of a single particle. As we work through the semester, we will revisit angular momentum and introduce how to work with distributions of mass and extended objects.

Definition of Angular Momentum

For a particle with a momentum p⃗\vec{p}, the angular momentum is defined as the cross product of the position vector r⃗\vec{r} and the momentum vector p⃗\vec{p},

L⃗=r⃗×p⃗=m(r⃗×v⃗).\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p} = m \left(\vec{r} \times \vec{v}\right).

This is a quantity that depends on the location of the particle relative origin of coordinates. This means you have some latitude in choosing the origin of coordinates, and you can choose the origin to simplify the problem.

This also means the angular momentum is a vector quantity, and it points in the direction perpendicular to the plane defined by the position and momentum vectors.

When is Angular Momentum Conserved?

We can ask this by computing the time derivative of the angular momentum,

dL⃗dt=ddt(r⃗×p⃗)=0?\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\vec{r} \times \vec{p}\right) = 0?

We did a calculation like this on a homework where we computed

ddt(a⃗×b⃗)=a⃗×db⃗dt+da⃗dt×b⃗.\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\vec{a}\times\vec{b}\right) = \vec{a}\times\dfrac{d\vec{b}}{dt} + \dfrac{d\vec{a}}{dt}\times\vec{b}.

Let’s apply it here:

dL⃗dt=ddt(r⃗×p⃗)=dr⃗dt×p⃗+r⃗×dp⃗dt.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\vec{r} \times \vec{p}\right) = \dfrac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \times \vec{p} + \vec{r} \times \dfrac{d\vec{p}}{dt}.

If we assume that m˙=0\dot{m}=0, then we can write the time derivative of the momentum as,

dp⃗dt=ddt(mv⃗)=mdv⃗dt\dfrac{d\vec{p}}{dt} = \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(m\vec{v}\right) = m\dfrac{d\vec{v}}{dt}

We group the terms in the time derivative of the angular momentum,

dL⃗dt=mdr⃗dt×v⃗⏟=0+mr⃗×dv⃗dt.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = m \underbrace{\dfrac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \times \vec{v}}_{=0} + m\vec{r} \times \dfrac{d\vec{v}}{dt}.

The first term the cross product of the velocity with itself v⃗×v⃗\vec{v}\times\vec{v}, and is zero, and the second term is the cross product of the position vector with the acceleration,

dL⃗dt=mr⃗×dv⃗dt=r⃗×ma⃗.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = m\vec{r} \times \dfrac{d\vec{v}}{dt} = \vec{r}\times m\vec{a}.

So the time derivative of the angular momentum is the net torque on the system!

τ⃗net=r⃗×F⃗net.\vec{\tau}_{net} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F}_{net}.
dL⃗dt=r⃗×ma⃗=r⃗×F⃗net\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \vec{r}\times m\vec{a} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F}_{net}
dL⃗dt=τ⃗net.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \vec{\tau}_{net}.

If the net torque on the system is zero, then the angular momentum is conserved, and it is a constant of the motion.

dL⃗sysdt=0.\dfrac{d\vec{L}_{sys}}{dt} = 0.
ΔL⃗sys=L⃗sys,f−L⃗sys,i=0.\Delta \vec{L}_{sys} = \vec{L}_{sys,f} - \vec{L}_{sys,i} = 0.

If there’s a net torque, we have a discrete update equation for the angular momentum,

L⃗sys,f=L⃗sys,i+τ⃗netΔt.\vec{L}_{sys,f} = \vec{L}_{sys,i} + \vec{\tau}_{net}\Delta t.

Are we sure there are no internal torques that matter?

We can ask the same question we asked about internal forces. Are there internal torques that matter? As before, let us define the total force on particle ii as the sum of internal and external forces,

F⃗i=F⃗iint+F⃗iext.\vec{F}_{i} = \vec{F}_{i}^{int} + \vec{F}_{i}^{ext}.

We assume there are no external forces, and so the net force on the system is the sum of the internal forces,

F⃗net=F⃗int.\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{int}.

For given object, we observe an angular momentum l⃗i\vec{l}_i that is the cross product of the position vector and the momentum vector. So the time derivative of the iith particle’s angular momentum is,

dl⃗idt=r⃗i×F⃗i.\dfrac{d\vec{l}_i}{dt} = \vec{r}_i \times \vec{F}_i.

If the total angular momentum of the system is the sum of the angular momenta of the particles,

L⃗=∑i=1Nl⃗i,\vec{L} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{l}_i,

then the time derivative of the total angular momentum is,

dL⃗dt=∑i=1Ndl⃗idt=∑i=1Nr⃗i×F⃗i.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \dfrac{d\vec{l}_i}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{r}_i \times \vec{F}_i.

Recall that F⃗i=∑j≠iNF⃗ij\vec{F}_i = \sum_{j\neq i}^{N} \vec{F}_{ij}. So we can rewrite the time derivative of the total angular momentum as,

dL⃗dt=∑i=1N∑j≠iNr⃗i×F⃗ij=∑i=1N∑j>iN(r⃗i×F⃗ij+r⃗j×F⃗ji)\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \sum_{j\neq i}^{N} \vec{r}_i \times \vec{F}_{ij} = \sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{j >i}^{N} \left(\vec{r}_i \times \vec{F}_{ij} + \vec{r}_j \times \vec{F}_{ji}\right)

Using F⃗ji=−F⃗ij\vec{F}_{ji}=-\vec{F}_{ij}, the paired torque is (r⃗i−r⃗j)×F⃗ij(\vec{r}_i-\vec{r}_j)\times\vec{F}_{ij}. It vanishes when the internal force is central, meaning parallel to the separation vector.

dL⃗dt=∑i=1N∑j>iN(r⃗i−r⃗j)×F⃗ij.\dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} =\sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{j>i}^{N} \left(\vec{r}_i - \vec{r}_j\right)\times \vec{F}_{ij}.

So if the internal forces are parallel to the separation between the particles, then the internal torques sum to zero, and the total angular momentum of the system is conserved. So things like the gravitational force, the electric force, and spring forces are all internal forces that do not contribute to the net torque on the system.

And thus,

dL⃗sysdt=0.\dfrac{d\vec{L}_{sys}}{dt} = 0.

Gravity is exactly this kind of central force, so a planet orbiting a star should conserve angular momentum throughout its orbit. This has a lovely geometric interpretation, known as Kepler’s second law: the position vector sweeps out equal areas in equal times, so the planet moves fastest near the star (perihelion) and slowest far away (aphelion).

<Figure size 600x600 with 1 Axes>

We can check this numerically by computing the specific angular momentum ℓ=∣r⃗×v⃗∣\ell = |\vec{r}\times\vec{v}| along the orbit. Even though the planet’s speed and distance from the star both change dramatically, ℓ\ell stays constant.

<Figure size 700x500 with 1 Axes>