4.8 L’Hôpital’s Rule

In this section, we examine a powerful tool for evaluating limits. This tool, known as L’Hôpital’s rule, uses derivatives to calculate limits. With this rule, we will be able to evaluate many limits we have not yet been able to determine. Instead of relying on numerical evidence to conjecture that a limit exists, we will be able to show definitively that a limit exists and to determine its exact value.

Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule

L’Hôpital’s rule can be used to evaluate limits involving the quotient of two functions. Consider

limxaf(x)g(x).

If limxaf(x)=L1andlimxag(x)=L20, then

limxaf(x)g(x)=L1L2.

However, what happens if limxaf(x)=0 and limxag(x)=0? We call this one of the indeterminate forms, of type 00. This is considered an indeterminate form because we cannot determine the exact behavior of f(x)g(x) as xa without further analysis. We have seen examples of this earlier in the text. For example, consider

limx2x24x2andlimx0sinxx.

For the first of these examples, we can evaluate the limit by factoring the numerator and writing

limx2x24x2=limx2(x+2)(x2)x2=limx2(x+2)=2+2=4.

For limx0sinxx we were able to show, using a geometric argument, that

limx0sinxx=1.

Here we use a different technique for evaluating limits such as these. Not only does this technique provide an easier way to evaluate these limits, but also, and more important, it provides us with a way to evaluate many other limits that we could not calculate previously.

The idea behind L’Hôpital’s rule can be explained using local linear approximations. Consider two differentiable functions f and g such that limxaf(x)=0=limxag(x) and such that g(a)0 For x near a, we can write

f(x)f(a)+f(a)(xa)

and

g(x)g(a)+g(a)(xa).

Therefore,

f(x)g(x)f(a)+f(a)(xa)g(a)+g(a)(xa).
Two functions y = f(x) and y = g(x) are drawn such that they cross at a point above x = a. The linear approximations of these two functions y = f(a) + f’(a)(x – a) and y = g(a) + g’(a)(x – a) are also drawn.
Figure 4.71 If limxaf(x)=limxag(x), then the ratio f(x)/g(x) is approximately equal to the ratio of their linear approximations near a.

Since f is differentiable at a, then f is continuous at a, and therefore f(a)=limxaf(x)=0. Similarly, g(a)=limxag(x)=0. If we also assume that f and g are continuous at x=a, then f(a)=limxaf(x) and g(a)=limxag(x). Using these ideas, we conclude that

limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)(xa)g(x)(xa)=limxaf(x)g(x).

Note that the assumption that f and g are continuous at a and g(a)0 can be loosened. We state L’Hôpital’s rule formally for the indeterminate form 00. Also note that the notation 00 does not mean we are actually dividing zero by zero. Rather, we are using the notation 00 to represent a quotient of limits, each of which is zero.

L’Hôpital’s Rule (0/0 Case)

Suppose f and g are differentiable functions over an open interval containing a, except possibly at a. If limxaf(x)=0 and limxag(x)=0, then

limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)g(x),

assuming the limit on the right exists or is or . This result also holds if we are considering one-sided limits, or if a=and.

Proof

We provide a proof of this theorem in the special case when f,g,f, and g are all continuous over an open interval containing a. In that case, since limxaf(x)=0=limxag(x) and f and g are continuous at a, it follows that f(a)=0=g(a). Therefore,

limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)f(a)g(x)g(a)sincef(a)=0=g(a)=limxaf(x)f(a)xag(x)g(a)xaalgebra=limxaf(x)f(a)xalimxag(x)g(a)xalimit of a quotient=f(a)g(a)definition of the derivative=limxaf(x)limxag(x)continuity offandg=limxaf(x)g(x).limit of a quotient

Note that L’Hôpital’s rule states we can calculate the limit of a quotient fg by considering the limit of the quotient of the derivatives fg. It is important to realize that we are not calculating the derivative of the quotient fg.

Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule (0/0 Case)

Evaluate each of the following limits by applying L’Hôpital’s rule.

  1. limx01cosxx
  2. limx1sin(πx)lnx
  3. limxe1/x11/x
  4. limx0sinxxx2
  1. Since the numerator 1cosx0 and the denominator x0, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate this limit. We have
    limx01cosxx=limx0ddx(1cosx)ddx(x)=limx0sinx1=limx0(sinx)limx0(1)=01=0.
  2. As x1, the numerator sin(πx)0 and the denominator ln(x)0. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
    limx1sin(πx)lnx=limx1πcos(πx)1/x=limx1(πx)cos(πx)=(π·1)(−1)=π.
  3. As x, the numerator e1/x10 and the denominator (1x)0. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
    limxe1/x11x=limxe1/x(−1x2)(−1x2)=limxe1/x=e0=1.
  4. As x0, both the numerator and denominator approach zero. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
    limx0sinxxx2=limx0cosx12x.

    Since the numerator and denominator of this new quotient both approach zero as x0, we apply L’Hôpital’s rule again. In doing so, we see that
    limx0cosx12x=limx0sinx2=0.

    Therefore, we conclude that
    limx0sinxxx2=0.

Evaluate limx0xtanx.

1

Hint

ddxtanx=sec2x

We can also use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limits of quotients f(x)g(x) in which f(x)± and g(x)±. Limits of this form are classified as indeterminate forms of type /. Again, note that we are not actually dividing by . Since is not a real number, that is impossible; rather, /. is used to represent a quotient of limits, each of which is or .

L’Hôpital’s Rule (/ Case)

Suppose f and g are differentiable functions over an open interval containing a, except possibly at a. Suppose limxaf(x)= (or ) and limxag(x)= (or ). Then,

limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)g(x),

assuming the limit on the right exists or is or . This result also holds if the limit is infinite, if a= or , or the limit is one-sided.

Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule (/ Case)

Evaluate each of the following limits by applying L’Hôpital’s rule.

  1. limx3x+52x+1
  2. limx0+lnxcotx
  1. Since 3x+5 and 2x+1 are first-degree polynomials with positive leading coefficients, limx(3x+5)= and limx(2x+1)=. Therefore, we apply L’Hôpital’s rule and obtain
    limx3x+52x+1=limx32=32.

    Note that this limit can also be calculated without invoking L’Hôpital’s rule. Earlier in the chapter we showed how to evaluate such a limit by dividing the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x in the denominator. In doing so, we saw that
    limx3x+52x+1=limx3+5/x2+1/x=32.

    L’Hôpital’s rule provides us with an alternative means of evaluating this type of limit.
  2. Here, limx0+lnx= and limx0+cotx=. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule and obtain
    limx0+lnxcotx=limx0+1/xcsc2x=limx0+1xcsc2x.

    Now as x0+, csc2x. Therefore, the first term in the denominator is approaching zero and the second term is getting really large. In such a case, anything can happen with the product. Therefore, we cannot make any conclusion yet. To evaluate the limit, we use the definition of cscx to write
    limx0+1xcsc2x=limx0+sin2xx.

    Now limx0+sin2x=0 and limx0+x=0, so we apply L’Hôpital’s rule again. We find
    limx0+sin2xx=limx0+2sinxcosx−1=0−1=0.

    We conclude that
    limx0+lnxcotx=0.

Evaluate limxlnx5x.

0

Hint

ddxlnx=1x

As mentioned, L’Hôpital’s rule is an extremely useful tool for evaluating limits. It is important to remember, however, that to apply L’Hôpital’s rule to a quotient f(x)g(x), it is essential that the limit of f(x)g(x) be of the form 00 or /. Consider the following example.

When L’Hôpital’s Rule Does Not Apply

Consider limx1x2+53x+4. Show that the limit cannot be evaluated by applying L’Hôpital’s rule.

Because the limits of the numerator and denominator are not both zero and are not both infinite, we cannot apply L’Hôpital’s rule. If we try to do so, we get

ddx(x2+5)=2x

and

ddx(3x+4)=3.

At which point we would conclude erroneously that

limx1x2+53x+4=limx12x3=23.

However, since limx1(x2+5)=6 and limx1(3x+4)=7, we actually have

limx1x2+53x+4=67.

We can conclude that

limx1x2+53x+4limx1ddx(x2+5)ddx(3x+4).

Explain why we cannot apply L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limx0+cosxx. Evaluate limx0+cosxx by other means.

limx0+cosx=1. Therefore, we cannot apply L’Hôpital’s rule. The limit of the quotient is

Hint

Determine the limits of the numerator and denominator separately.

Other Indeterminate Forms

L’Hôpital’s rule is very useful for evaluating limits involving the indeterminate forms 00 and /. However, we can also use L’Hôpital’s rule to help evaluate limits involving other indeterminate forms that arise when evaluating limits. The expressions 0·, , 1, 0, and 00 are all considered indeterminate forms. These expressions are not real numbers. Rather, they represent forms that arise when trying to evaluate certain limits. Next we realize why these are indeterminate forms and then understand how to use L’Hôpital’s rule in these cases. The key idea is that we must rewrite the indeterminate forms in such a way that we arrive at the indeterminate form 00 or /.

Indeterminate Form of Type 0·

Suppose we want to evaluate limxa(f(x)·g(x)), where f(x)0 and g(x) (or ) as xa. Since one term in the product is approaching zero but the other term is becoming arbitrarily large (in magnitude), anything can happen to the product. We use the notation 0· to denote the form that arises in this situation. The expression 0· is considered indeterminate because we cannot determine without further analysis the exact behavior of the product f(x)g(x) as xa. For example, let n be a positive integer and consider

f(x)=1(xn+1)andg(x)=3x2.

As x, f(x)0 and g(x). However, the limit as x of f(x)g(x)=3x2(xn+1) varies, depending on n. If n=2, then limxf(x)g(x)=3. If n=1, then limxf(x)g(x)=. If n=3, then limxf(x)g(x)=0. Here we consider another limit involving the indeterminate form 0· and show how to rewrite the function as a quotient to use L’Hôpital’s rule.

Indeterminate Form of Type 0·

Evaluate limx0+xlnx.

First, rewrite the function xlnx as a quotient to apply L’Hôpital’s rule. If we write

xlnx=lnx1/x,

we see that lnx as x0+ and 1x as x0+. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule and obtain

limx0+lnx1/x=limx0+ddx(lnx)ddx(1/x)=limx0+1/x-1/x2=limx0+(x)=0.

We conclude that

limx0+xlnx=0.
The function y = x ln(x) is graphed for values x ≥ 0. At x = 0, the value of the function is 0.
Figure 4.72 Finding the limit at x=0 of the function f(x)=xlnx.

Evaluate limx0xcotx.

1

Hint

Write xcotx=xcosxsinx

Indeterminate Form of Type

Another type of indeterminate form is . Consider the following example. Let n be a positive integer and let f(x)=3xn and g(x)=3x2+5. As x, f(x) and g(x). We are interested in limx(f(x)g(x)). Depending on whether f(x) grows faster, g(x) grows faster, or they grow at the same rate, as we see next, anything can happen in this limit. Since f(x) and g(x), we write to denote the form of this limit. As with our other indeterminate forms, has no meaning on its own and we must do more analysis to determine the value of the limit. For example, suppose the exponent n in the function f(x)=3xn is n=3, then

limx(f(x)g(x))=limx(3x33x25)=.

On the other hand, if n=2, then

limx(f(x)g(x))=limx(3x23x25)=−5.

However, if n=1, then

limx(f(x)g(x))=limx(3x3x25)=.

Therefore, the limit cannot be determined by considering only . Next we see how to rewrite an expression involving the indeterminate form as a fraction to apply L’Hôpital’s rule.

Indeterminate Form of Type

Evaluate limx0+(1x21tanx).

By combining the fractions, we can write the function as a quotient. Since the least common denominator is x2tanx, we have

1x21tanx=(tanx)x2x2tanx.

As x0+, the numerator tanxx20 and the denominator x2tanx0. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. Taking the derivatives of the numerator and the denominator, we have

limx0+(tanx)x2x2tanx=limx0+(sec2x)2xx2sec2x+2xtanx.

As x0+, (sec2x)2x1 and x2sec2x+2xtanx0. Since the denominator is positive as x approaches zero from the right, we conclude that

limx0+(sec2x)2xx2sec2x+2xtanx=.

Therefore,

limx0+(1x21tanx)=.

Evaluate limx0+(1x1sinx).

0

Hint

Rewrite the difference of fractions as a single fraction.

Another type of indeterminate form that arises when evaluating limits involves exponents. The expressions 00, 0, and 1 are all indeterminate forms. On their own, these expressions are meaningless because we cannot actually evaluate these expressions as we would evaluate an expression involving real numbers. Rather, these expressions represent forms that arise when finding limits. Now we examine how L’Hôpital’s rule can be used to evaluate limits involving these indeterminate forms.

Since L’Hôpital’s rule applies to quotients, we use the natural logarithm function and its properties to reduce a problem evaluating a limit involving exponents to a related problem involving a limit of a quotient. For example, suppose we want to evaluate limxaf(x)g(x) and we arrive at the indeterminate form 0. (The indeterminate forms 00 and 1 can be handled similarly.) We proceed as follows. Let

y=f(x)g(x).

Then,

lny=ln(f(x)g(x))=g(x)ln(f(x)).

Therefore,

limxa[ln(y)]=limxa[g(x)ln(f(x))].

Since limxaf(x)=, we know that limxaln(f(x))=. Therefore, limxag(x)ln(f(x)) is of the indeterminate form 0·, and we can use the techniques discussed earlier to rewrite the expression g(x)ln(f(x)) in a form so that we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. Suppose limxag(x)ln(f(x))=L, where L may be or . Then

limxa[ln(y)]=L.

Since the natural logarithm function is continuous, we conclude that

ln(limxay)=L,

which gives us

limxay=limxaf(x)g(x)=eL.
Indeterminate Form of Type 0

Evaluate limxx1/x.

Let y=x1/x. Then,

lny=ln(x1/x)=1xlnx=lnxx.

We need to evaluate limxlnxx. Applying L’Hôpital’s rule, we obtain

limxlny=limxlnxx=limx1/x1=0.

Therefore, limxlny=0. Since the natural logarithm function is continuous, we conclude that

ln(limxy)=0,

which leads to

limxy=eln(y)=lim e0=1.(All limits x  .)

Hence,

limxx1/x=1.

Evaluate limxx1/ln(x).

e

Hint

Let y=x1/ln(x) and apply the natural logarithm to both sides of the equation.

Indeterminate Form of Type 00

Evaluate limx0+xsinx.

Let

y=xsinx.

Therefore,

lny=ln(xsinx)=sinxlnx.

We now evaluate limx0+sinxlnx. Since limx0+sinx=0 and limx0+lnx=, we have the indeterminate form 0·. To apply L’Hôpital’s rule, we need to rewrite sinxlnx as a fraction. We could write

sinxlnx=sinx1/lnx

or

sinxlnx=lnx1/sinx=lnxcscx.

Let’s consider the first option. In this case, applying L’Hôpital’s rule, we would obtain

limx0+sinxlnx=limx0+sinx1/lnx=limx0+cosx−1/(x(lnx)2)=limx0+(x(lnx)2cosx).

Unfortunately, we not only have another expression involving the indeterminate form 0·, but the new limit is even more complicated to evaluate than the one with which we started. Instead, we try the second option. By writing

sinxlnx=lnx1/sinx=lnxcscx,

and applying L’Hôpital’s rule, we obtain

limx0+sinxlnx=limx0+lnxcscx=limx0+1/xcscxcotx=limx0+−1xcscxcotx.

Using the fact that cscx=1sinx and cotx=cosxsinx, we can rewrite the expression on the right-hand side as

limx0+sin2xxcosx=limx0+[sinxx·(tanx)]=(limx0+sinxx)·(limx0+(tanx))=1·0=0.

We conclude that limx0+lny=0. Therefore, ln(limx0+y)=0 and we have

limx0+y=limx0+xsinx=e0=1.

Hence,

limx0+xsinx=1.

Evaluate limx0+xx.

1

Hint

Let y=xx and take the natural logarithm of both sides of the equation.

Growth Rates of Functions

Suppose the functions f and g both approach infinity as x. Although the values of both functions become arbitrarily large as the values of x become sufficiently large, sometimes one function is growing more quickly than the other. For example, f(x)=x2 and g(x)=x3 both approach infinity as x. However, as shown in the following table, the values of x3 are growing much faster than the values of x2.

Table 4.7 Comparing the Growth Rates of x2 and x3
x10100100010,000
f(x)=x210010,0001,000,000100,000,000
g(x)=x310001,000,0001,000,000,0001,000,000,000,000

This table has three rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, f(x) = x2, and g(x) = x3. To the right of the header, the first row reads 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000. The second row reads 100, 10,000, 1,000,000, and 100,000,000. The third row reads 1000, 1,000,000, 1,000,000,000, and 1,000,000,000,000.

In fact,

limxx3x2=limxx=.or, equivalently,limxx2x3=limx1x=0.

As a result, we say x3 is growing more rapidly than x2 as x. On the other hand, for f(x)=x2 and g(x)=3x2+4x+1, although the values of g(x) are always greater than the values of f(x) for x>0, each value of g(x) is roughly three times the corresponding value of f(x) as x, as shown in the following table. In fact,

limxx23x2+4x+1=13.
Table 4.8 Comparing the Growth Rates of x2 and 3x2+4x+1
x10100100010,000
f(x)=x210010,0001,000,000100,000,000
g(x)=3x2+4x+134130,4013,004,001300,040,001

This table has three rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, f(x) = x2, and g(x) = 3x2 + 4x + 1. To the right of the header, the first row reads 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000. The second row reads 100, 10,000, 1,000,000, and 100,000,000. The third row reads 341, 30,401, 3,004,001, and 300,040,001.

In this case, we say that x2 and 3x2+4x+1 are growing at the same rate as x.

More generally, suppose f and g are two functions that approach infinity as x. We say g grows more rapidly than f as x if

limxg(x)f(x)=;or, equivalently,limxf(x)g(x)=0.

On the other hand, if there exists a constant M0 such that

limxf(x)g(x)=M,

we say f and g grow at the same rate as x.

Next we see how to use L’Hôpital’s rule to compare the growth rates of power, exponential, and logarithmic functions.

Comparing the Growth Rates of ln(x), x2, and ex

For each of the following pairs of functions, use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limx(f(x)g(x)).

  1. f(x)=x2andg(x)=ex
  2. f(x)=ln(x)andg(x)=x2
  1. Since limxx2= and limxex=, we can use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limx[x2ex]. We obtain
    limxx2ex=limx2xex.

    Since limx2x= and limxex=, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule again. Since
    limx2xex=limx2ex=0,

    we conclude that
    limxx2ex=0.

    Therefore, ex grows more rapidly than x2 as x (See Figure 4.73 and Table 4.9).
    The functions g(x) = ex and f(x) = x2 are graphed. It is obvious that g(x) increases much more quickly than f(x).
    Figure 4.73 An exponential function grows at a faster rate than a power function.
    Table 4.9 Growth rates of a power function and an exponential function.
    x5101520
    x225100225400
    ex14822,0263,269,017485,165,195

    This table has three rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, x2, and ex. To the right of the header, the first row reads 5, 10, 15, and 20. The second row reads 25, 100, 225, and 400. The third row reads 148, 22,026, 3,269,017, and 485,165,195.

  2. Since limxlnx= and limxx2=, we can use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limxlnxx2. We obtain
    limxlnxx2=limx1/x2x=limx12x2=0.

    Thus, x2 grows more rapidly than lnx as x (see Figure 4.74 and Table 4.10).
    The functions g(x) = x2 and f(x) = ln(x) are graphed. It is obvious that g(x) increases much more quickly than f(x).
    Figure 4.74 A power function grows at a faster rate than a logarithmic function.
    Table 4.10 Growth rates of a power function and a logarithmic function
    x10100100010,000
    ln(x)2.3034.6056.9089.210
    x210010,0001,000,000100,000,000

    This table has three rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, ln(x), and x2. To the right of the header, the first row reads 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000. The second row reads 2.303, 4.605, 6.908, and 9.210. The third row reads 100, 10,000, 1,000,000, and 100,000,000.

Compare the growth rates of x100 and 2x.

The function 2x grows faster than x100.

Hint

Apply L’Hôpital’s rule to x100/2x

Using the same ideas as in Example 4.45a. it is not difficult to show that ex grows more rapidly than xp for any p>0. In Figure 4.75 and Table 4.11, we compare ex with x3 and x4 as x.

This figure has two figures marked a and b. In figure a, the functions y = ex and y = x3 are graphed. It is obvious that ex increases more quickly than x3. In figure b, the functions y = ex and y = x4 are graphed. It is obvious that ex increases much more quickly than x4, but the point at which that happens is further to the right than it was for x3.
Figure 4.75 The exponential function ex grows faster than xp for any p>0. (a) A comparison of ex with x3. (b) A comparison of ex with x4.
Table 4.11 An exponential function grows at a faster rate than any power function
x5101520
x3125100033758000
x462510,00050,625160,000
ex14822,0263,269,017485,165,195

This table has four rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, x3, x4, and ex. To the right of the header, the first row reads 5, 10, 15, and 20. The second row reads 125, 1000, 3375, and 8000. The third row reads 625, 10,000, 50,625, and 160,000. The fourth row reads 148, 22,026, 3,269,017, and 485,165,195.

Similarly, it is not difficult to show that xp grows more rapidly than lnx for any p>0. In Figure 4.76 and Table 4.12, we compare lnx with x3 and x.

This figure shows y = the square root of x, y = the cube root of x, and y = ln(x). It is apparent that y = ln(x) grows more slowly than either of these functions.
Figure 4.76 The function y=ln(x) grows more slowly than xp for any p>0 as x.
Table 4.12 A logarithmic function grows at a slower rate than any root function
x10100100010,000
ln(x)2.3034.6056.9089.210
x32.1544.6421021.544
x3.1621031.623100

This table has four rows and five columns. The first column is a header column, and it reads from top to bottom x, ln(x), the cube root of x, and the square root of x. To the right of the header, the first row reads 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000. The second row reads 2.303, 4.605, 6.908, and 9.210. The third row reads 2.154, 4.642, 10, and 21.544. The fourth row reads 3.162, 10, 31.623, and 100.

Key Concepts

For the following exercises, evaluate the limit.

Evaluate the limit limxexx.

Evaluate the limit limxexxk.

Evaluate the limit limxlnxxk.

Evaluate the limit limxaxax2a2,a0.

12a

Evaluate the limit limxaxax3a3,a0.

Evaluate the limit limxaxaxnan,a0.

1nan1

For the following exercises, determine whether you can apply L’Hôpital’s rule directly. Explain why or why not. Then, indicate if there is some way you can alter the limit so you can apply L’Hôpital’s rule.

limx0+x2lnx

limxx1/x

Cannot apply directly; use logarithms

limx0x2/x

limx0x21/x

Cannot apply directly; rewrite as limx0x3

limxexx

For the following exercises, evaluate the limits with either L’Hôpital’s rule or previously learned methods.

limx3x29x3

6

limx3x29x+3

limx0(1+x)−21x

−2

limxπ/2cosxπ2x

limxπxπsinx

−1

limx1x1sinx

limx0(1+x)n1x

n

limx0(1+x)n1nxx2

limx0sinxtanxx3

12

limx01+x1xx

limx0exx1x2

12

limx0+tanxx

limx1x1lnx

1

limx0(x+1)1/x

limx1xx3x1

16

limx0+x2x

limxxsin(1x)

1

limx0sinxxx2

limx0+xln(x4)

0

limx(xex)

limxx2ex

0

limx03x2xx

limx01+1/x11/x

−1

limxπ/4(1tanx)cotx

limxxe1/x

limx0+x1/cosx

limx0+x1/x

0

limx0-(11x)x

limx(11x)x

1e

For the following exercises, use a calculator to graph the function and estimate the value of the limit, then use L’Hôpital’s rule to find the limit directly.

[T] limx0ex1x

[T] limx0xsin(1x)

0

[T] limx1x11cos(πx)

[T] limx1e(x1)1x1

1

[T] limx1(x1)2lnx

[T] limxπ1+cosxsinx

0

[T] limx0(cscx1x)

[T] limx0+tan(xx)

tan(1)

[T] limx0+lnxsinx

[T] limx0exexx

2

Glossary

indeterminate forms
when evaluating a limit, the forms 00, /, 0·, , 00, 0, and 1 are considered indeterminate because further analysis is required to determine whether the limit exists and, if so, what its value is
L’Hôpital’s rule
if f and g are differentiable functions over an interval a, except possibly at a, and limxaf(x)=0=limxag(x) or limxaf(x) and limxag(x) are infinite, then limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)g(x), assuming the limit on the right exists or is or